论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价和分析安舒恩雅IUD与吉妮柔适IUD两种固定式宫内节育器的临床使用效果及不良反应。方法:对自愿要求放置IUD而无禁忌证的育龄期妇女160例,随机86例放置安舒恩雅IUD,74例放置吉妮柔适IUD并进行随访,观察置器后的1、3、6、12个月避孕效果及不良反应。结果:安舒恩雅IUD与吉妮柔适IUD相比较,1、3、6、12个月续用率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),12月时其不良反应中经量增多、白带改变情况及性生活不适方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:吉妮柔适IUD与安舒恩雅IUD均有良好的避孕效果及可接受性。安舒恩雅IUD在白带改变及性生活不适方面略优于吉妮柔适IUD,值得临床推广应用。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and analyze the clinical effects and adverse reactions of two kinds of IUDs, Anshunya IUD and Gini IUD. Methods: One hundred and sixty cases of women of childbearing age were randomly assigned to receive IUD without contraindications. One hundred and sixty patients were randomized into Anshunya IUD and 74 patients with Gini Nephrotic IUD. All patients were followed up for 1,3,6 , 12 months of contraceptive effects and adverse reactions. Results: There were no significant differences in the recovery rates of 1,3,6 and 12 months between Anshun Ya IUD and Gentle Soft IUD (P> 0.05) , Leucorrhea changes and sexual discomfort, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both Goodison IUD and Anshoutya IUD have good contraceptive efficacy and acceptability. Anshun Ya IUD in vaginal changes and sexual discomfort slightly better than Gentle soft IUD, it is worth to clinical application.