刑事诉讼过程的实质就是收集、审查、运用证据的过程。刑事案件事实都是已发生的事件,办案人员不可能直接去感知,而只能间接的通过各种证据来认识,由此,诉讼的核心内容是由证据所支撑的事实争议,在刑事诉讼过程中,证据的质量(也就是证据的“三性”及证明力问题)就显得尤为重要;收集证据是审查、运用证据的前提和基础,而由于证据具有时效性,随着时空的转移,证据的收集难度不断增大,而证明力却不断降低,因此,证据的及时全面客观规范收集在整个诉讼过程中则处于重中之重的地位。特别是随着新《律师法》的颁布,证据瑕疵更是控辨双方争辩的焦点,而证据瑕疵往往会影响到案件的最终处理结果。在本文中,笔者将结合在基层刑事检察工作中对公安机关移送审查起诉的案件当中常见的几类证据问题进行列举分析,并提出相应的建议,以期能对办案一线的侦查人员在证据收集方面提供一定的参考,进一步促进检警关系,共同为提高案件质量而努力。 The essence of criminal procedure is the process of collecting, examining and using evidence. Criminal cases are all facts that have occurred, investigators can not directly to the perception, but only indirectly through a variety of evidence to understand, therefore, the litigation is the core content supported by the evidence of factual controversy in the criminal proceedings , The quality of evidence (that is, the “three nature” of evidence and the question of proof) is particularly important. The collection of evidence is the premise and basis for the examination and use of evidence. As the evidence is time-efficient, with the transfer of time and space , The difficulty of collecting evidence increases continuously, while the proof power decreases continuously. Therefore, timely and comprehensive collection of objective norms of evidence is in the most important position in the entire litigation process. Especially with the promulgation of the new “Lawyer’s Law,” evidence flaws are the focus of controversy and controversy, and evidence flaws often affect the final handling of the case. In this paper, the author will combine the basic criminal prosecution work on the public security organs to transfer prosecution cases of common evidence of several types of enumeration and make recommendations, in order to be able to investigators front-line investigators in evidence collection Provide some reference to further promote the relationship between police and police and work together to improve the quality of cases.