我中南區有不少公私合營的企業(工礦、貿易、金融、交通各方面都有)。對這種企業的領導,一般是缺乏經驗的。據已了解的材料。將领导权完全交予私股代理人(指舊有經理与董事等),不問不聞者固然有,但主要偏向,還是由各級政府、企业主管部門全權支配,不尊重私股權力和利益。這样就限制了私人資本的積極性,對人民政府正確的經濟政策。亦引起不少的懷疑与誤解,調整工商業與公私关係中,對这些企业的领导,亦應根據‘公私兼顾,各得其所’的原則,予以合理的調整。為此,本會特作下列措示: 一、首先在思想上明確,公私合营的企业是国家资本主义性質的企业。因其中有公股,又有私股,故在领导上,既不同於私人资本主义企业, There are many public-private joint-venture enterprises in Central China (mining, trade, finance, transportation, etc.). The leadership of such enterprises is generally inexperienced. It has been learned material. The leadership will be completely given to the private equity agent (referring to the old managers and directors, etc.), do not ask people who do not know do not smoke, but the main bias, or by all levels of government, business departments at their disposal, does not respect the private power and interests . This limits the enthusiasm of private capital and the correct economic policies of the people’s government. It has also aroused quite a lot of doubts and misunderstandings. In the relations between business and industry and between public and private industries, the leadership of these enterprises should be adjusted reasonably according to the principle of “giving consideration to both public and private affairs”. To this end, this Council specially made the following measures: First, the first clear ideological and public-private partnerships are state-owned capitalist enterprises. Because there are public shares, there are private shares, so the leadership is different from the private capitalist enterprises,