目前,在我国绝大多数学校,对教师工作的评价是采用“传统法”,即实行平时考察与定期考核相结合,个人鉴定与群众评议相结合。其一般程序是教师个人总结,群众评议,领导拍板定论。这种评价方法虽具有一定弹性,有一定可取之处,但终不是理想的评价方法,它有其难以克服的弱点。根本原因在于这种方法,没能获得被评价者主动的参与,没能摆脱神秘的桎梏,缺乏评价信息的及时反馈,纯定性的经验式评价居于主导地位,评价主体的素质和个人感情起着举足轻重的作用。考评的科学性差,准确性低,带有主观随意性。信度很低, At present, in most schools in our country, the evaluation of teachers’ work adopts the “traditional law”, that is, the combination of ordinary inspection and periodic assessment, and the combination of personal identification and mass assessment. The general procedure is a teacher’s personal summary, the masses comment, the final decision of the leadership. Although this evaluation method has a certain flexibility, there are certain merits, but in the end is not an ideal evaluation method, it has its insurmountable weakness. The fundamental reason is that this method failed to obtain the active participation of the appraisers, did not get rid of the mysterious shyness, lack of timely feedback of appraisal information, and pure qualitative empirical appraisal dominates. The qualities and personal feelings of appraisers played Important role. Poor scientific evaluation, low accuracy, with subjective arbitrary. Low reliability,