论文部分内容阅读
2015年4月15日,最高人民法院发布了指导案例48号《北京精雕科技有限公司诉上海奈凯电子科技有限公司侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷案》。为了深入理解和准确参照适用该指导性案例,现对该指导性案例的推选经过、裁判要点等有关情况予以解释、论证和说明。一、推选经过及其指导意义《最高人民法院关于案例指导工作的规定》第9条规定,对于本规定施行前,最高人民法院已经发布的对全国法院审判、执行工作具有指导意义的案例,应当清
On April 15, 2015, Supreme People’s Court issued Guiding Case No.48 “Beijing Jingdiao Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Nai Kai Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of Copyright of Computer Software Dispute”. In order to deeply understand and accurately refer to the application of the guiding case, we hereby explain, justify and explain the relevant circumstances of the selection of the guiding case, points of referees and so on. I. Selection and its Guiding Significance Article 9 of the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Case Guidance Work stipulates that before the implementation of these Provisions, the Supreme People’s Court has promulgated a case that is of guiding significance to the trial and enforcement by courts across the country. clear