论文部分内容阅读
过去一百年,乃著书立说之一百年。词学研究包括柳永研究,当甚有可观之处。但是,这一百年,究竟当从何说起,三言两语说不清,千言万语恐怕也说不清楚。我尝试以批评模式对于过去一百年乃至一千年进行划分与判断。以为:中国词学,以一九○八为分界线。此前千余年,词界通行本色论,以似与非似为标准论词,是为古词学或旧词学,以有无境界为标准论词,是为今词学或新词学。因为这一年是王国
In the past one hundred years, it was written for a hundred years. Ci study includes Liu Yong study, when there is considerable respectable. However, in the past 100 years, when we start talking about it, we can not make a few words or make any clarification about it. I try to criticize the pattern for the past one hundred years and even a thousand years division and judgment. Thought: Chinese Ci study, to 1908 as the dividing line. Previously more than a thousand years, the word boundary pass the color theory, with similarities and non-like as the standard argument is for the ancient Ci-poetry or old Ci-poetry, with or without boundaries as the standard on the word, is today Ci-study or neo-Ci study. Because this year is a kingdom