世界上有两个相对的法律体系:主张经济自由化的盎格鲁-撒克逊或普通法体系,和主张经济调控的罗马-日耳曼或拉丁法系。一方偏重快捷,认为这是效率,这无疑会带来风险,进而是事后的诉讼。而另一体系注重安全,即事先控制,因此要求一定的形式主义。选择哪一法律体系,除了会产生文化上的影响(“法律之于社会正如语法之于语言”),对一个国家的经济战略有决定性意义:如果选择快捷,那就采用 There are two opposing legal systems in the world: the Anglo-Saxon or common-law system that advocates economic liberalization and the Roman-Germanic or Latin legal system that advocates economic regulation. One side of emphasis on fast, that this is efficiency, which will undoubtedly bring the risk, then the lawsuit afterwards. The other system focuses on safety, that is, prior control, thus requiring some formalism. The choice of a legal system, apart from having a cultural impact (“Laws in society just as grammar in language”), is decisive for the economic strategy of a country: if it is quicker to choose