论文部分内容阅读
在一个身份社会中,例如,16-18世纪的欧洲,市场经济的发展是对传统社会等级制度的一个威胁。在那种背景下,某些情感的污名化是掌握在那些支持贵族立场的人手中的一种武器。这种贵族立场支持馈赠经济,反对基于价格估价之上的市场经济。源于两种观点的经济行为形成了行为上的极端化,贵族的慷慨和商人的贪婪。当他们的价值相矛盾并遭到批判时,双方都有一种情感反应,尤其是愤怒的反应,但这些情感表现是被社会不平等地忍受的。两种经济之间的对立,反映在中世纪教会针对贪婪、高利贷和贪欲发动的斗争。反映了当代所关注主题的一些16与17世纪戏剧表明,舞台上表现的贪婪和慷慨的经济行为与在那一时期司法档案中发现的经济行为是一致的。这些情感的出场,以及写给国王请求宽恕的赦免令也表明,由于社会地位和性别不同,社会不同部分忍受法律的程度是不同的。在近代欧洲,社会地位越高的人,就越有愤怒的权利。
In an identity society, such as Europe in the 16th and 18th centuries, the development of a market economy is a threat to the traditional social hierarchy. In that context, the stigmatization of certain emotions is a weapon in the hands of those who support aristocratic positions. This aristocratic position supports the gift economy against the market economy based on price valuation. Economic behavior stemming from two perspectives leads to the extreme of behavior, the generosity of aristocrats and the greed of merchants. When their values contradict and are criticized, both sides have an emotional reaction, especially an angry response, but these emotional manifestations are endured unequally by the community. The opposition between the two economies is reflected in the medieval Church’s struggle against greed, usury, and greed. Some of the 16th and 17th centuries that reflect the contemporary themes of concern show that the greedy and generous economic performance on stage is consistent with the economic behavior found in the judicial files of that period. The appearance of these emotions and the amnesty order sent to the king for forgiveness also show that the degree to which different parts of society endure law is different due to social status and gender. In modern Europe, the higher the status of society, the more angry the right.