论文部分内容阅读
文章认为蔡定剑教授《历史与变革——新中国法制建设的历程》对于我们总结新中国成立以来的法制建设具有很大的帮助,但是由于其对历史本身没有进行准确的认识和思考,所以其反思是有一定的限度,本文以“评价建国之初新中国彻底摧毁旧法统这一具有深远影响的事件”为切入点,从对历史进行同情式解读为基本视角,将“摧毁”置于特定的历史环境和传统中进行理解,即认为摧毁的只是与我们共产党人的革命传统存在根本差异的旧法统。并通过比较蔡定剑教授和朱苏力教授的进路来尝试揭示二者在这个问题解释力和限度。
The article holds that Professor Cai Dingjian’s “History and Change - The Course of Legal Construction in New China” is of great help to us in summarizing the legal construction since the founding of New China. However, due to its lack of accurate understanding and thinking of history itself, There is a certain limit. Based on the basic concept of sympathetic interpretation of history, this paper takes “Evaluating the New China Completely Destroying the Old Rule of Law as a Far-reaching Event” at the Beginning of the PRC as the Starting Point, To be understood in a particular historical context and tradition is the destruction of an old law that is fundamentally different from the revolutionary traditions of our Communists. By comparing the approaches of Professor Cai Dingjian and Professor Zhu Su Li, we try to reveal the explanatory power and limit of the two in this issue.