论文部分内容阅读
逮捕作为刑事诉讼过程中最为严厉的强制措施,其适用是受到严格限制的。除了嫌疑人的确存在逮捕的必要外,还要求嫌疑人涉嫌犯罪的可能性达到一定的程度。而这种判断则需要以证据为基础,来确定其是否达到了逮捕证明标准。由于我国逮捕证明标准的规定过于抽象化,司法实践在如何把握证据上出现了模糊的认识,影响了逮捕正常功能的发挥,笔者通过对我国及国外部分国家逮捕的证明标准的分析、介绍,分析我国逮捕证明标准存在的问题,并结合工作实际,浅谈对怎样把握我国逮捕证明标准的认识。
As the most severe compulsory measure in the process of criminal procedure, the application of arrest is severely restricted. In addition to the suspect does exist the need for arrest, but also requires the possibility of suspects suspected of crime to a certain extent. Such judgments need to be based on evidence to determine whether they have met the standards of proof of arrest. Due to the absurdity of the stipulation of the standard of arrest evidence in our country, the judicial practice has vague understanding of how to grasp the evidence and affects the normal function of arrest. The author analyzes, introduces and analyzes the proof standards of arrest in some countries in China and abroad Argument about the Problems of Arresting Evidence in China and Combining with the Actual Work, How to Understand the Standard of Arrest in Our Country?