论文部分内容阅读
在自由与道德责任的问题上,有三种基本的理论,即自由论、相容论和强决定论。这三种道德理论中,在是否接受决定论对人类行为的解释的问题上,强决定论与相容论的回答是肯定的。在决定论与自由是否相容的问题上,强决定论与自由论的回答是否定的。与自由论和相容论都不同的地方在于,强决定论认为,人对于其行为是没有道德责任的。强决定论的道德理论分为两个方面:一方面是对自由论和相容论的批判,以表明为什么这两种道德理论都是错误的;另一方面是阐述自己的道德理论,以论证为什么自由和道德责任是幻想。但是,当强决定论把自由和道德责任视为人类的幻想之后,这种理论必然走向道德虚无主义。
On the issue of freedom and moral responsibility, there are three basic theories: liberalism, compatibility theory and strong determinism. Of the three moral theories, the answer to the strong determinism and the compatibility theory is affirmative on whether or not to accept the determinism’s interpretation of human behavior. In the determinism and freedom are compatible with the issue, the strong determinism and freedom of the answer is negative. What is different from liberal theory and compatible theory is that strong determinism holds that man has no moral responsibility for his actions. The strong determinism of moral theory is divided into two aspects: on the one hand is the critique of liberalism and compatibility theory to show why the two moral theories are wrong; on the other hand is to elaborate their own moral theory to argue Why freedom and moral responsibility are illusions? However, when strong determinism treats freedom and moral responsibility as human illusions, this theory must inevitably go towards moral nihilism.