近年来,宪法学界由对具体宪法规范的解释方案的争论,发展至对于宪法解释本身作纯粹方法论的探究。此种发展的动因在很大程度上乃在于人们发现,对同一宪法规范的解释方案之所以差别巨大,皆有其方法论上的根由。正是冀图通过肃理宪法学在方法论根本上的繁枝蔓叶,正本清源,方有可能使学界就具体规范的解释方案达至普遍可接受的相对“共识”。而在宪法解释之方法论探究的诸多面向之中,宪法解释的目标具有分外重量。众所 In recent years, the constitutional academic circles have developed from the controversy over the interpretation of specific constitutional norms to the purely methodological exploration of the constitutional interpretation itself. Much of the motivation for such development lies in the discovery that the explanations of the same constitutional norms vary widely and have their own methodological roots. It is precisely because Hebei Province attempted to clear the source of its methodology by practicing constitutional science. The original Qing source has the potential to enable the academic community to reach a generally acceptable and relative “consensus” on specific normative explanations. Among the many aspects of the methodology of constitutional interpretation, the goal of constitutional interpretation is exceptionally weighty. All