生命因有对死亡的思考而丰腴——评阎连科的《一个人的三条河》

来源 :文学教育(上) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:junwen2009
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
人总是要死的。这是一句废话。但又不是一句废话。它是有潜台词的,话中有话:人总是要死的,何必较真呢?何必一本正经呢?何必太在意呢?说这句话时,口气一定有那么一点儿玩世不恭,有那么一点儿怀才不遇,口气让这句话有了另外的意义,所以口气也成为一种价值观。不过,“人总是要死的”是句大实话。每个人都别指望逃脱死亡的追捕,无论你是总统还是庶民,被死亡抓住,只是迟和早、轻和重、衰和荣的问题。这些问题似乎都不那么重要——因为死亡的早晚、死后的盖棺定论死者已无从知晓,与死者本身没什么 People are always dying. This is a nonsense. But not a nonsense. It is a subtext, words are: people are always dying, why more serious? Why should it be serious? Why care too much? Say these words, the tone must be a little cynical, so little pregnant, Tone makes the sentence have another meaning, so tone has become a value. However, “people are dying ” is a big truth. Do not expect anyone to escape from the hunt for death. Whether you are a president or a common person, being caught up in death, it is only a matter of lateness, lightness, heavyness, failure and honor. None of these problems seems to be so important - because sooner or later, the deceased dead are not sure, and the dead are nothing
其他文献