论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析两种方法诊断女性需氧菌阴道炎的效果。方法使用Donders湿片高倍镜检法、Tempera临床和微生物诊断法对2014年5月至2015年4月妇科门诊8 326例就诊患者需氧菌感染情况进行对比分析。结果在8 326例就诊患者中,采用Donders湿片高倍镜检法检出需氧菌阴道炎患者1 819例,检出率为21.8%;采用Tempera临床和微生物诊断法检出需氧菌阴道炎患者1 825例,检出率为21.9%。通过SPSS13.0统计学分析,两种方法在需氧菌阴道炎检出率方面不存在显著差异(χ2=20.4,P>0.05)。结论这两种方法诊断需氧菌阴道炎具有很好的一致性,医院可根据自身实际情况选择其中一种。南宁地区女性需氧菌阴道炎检出率仅次于细菌性阴道病,针对需氧菌阴道炎应采取科学有效的治疗方案,提升需氧菌阴道炎治疗效率。
Objective To comparatively analyze the effect of two methods in diagnosis of female aerobic vaginitis. Methods The comparative analysis of aerobic bacterial infections in 8 326 gynecological outpatients from May 2014 to April 2015 was conducted using the Donders wet-lens high-power microscopy and the Tempera clinical and microbiological diagnostic methods. Results A total of 1 819 patients with aerobic bacterial vaginitis were detected by Donders wet-plaque high-power microscopy in 8 326 patients. The detection rate was 21.8%. Aerobic bacterial vaginitis was detected by the clinical and microbiological diagnosis of Tempera There were 1825 patients with a detection rate of 21.9%. By SPSS13.0 statistical analysis, the two methods in the detection rate of aerobic bacteria vaginitis there is no significant difference (χ2 = 20.4, P> 0.05). Conclusion The two methods of diagnosis of aerobic bacterial vaginitis have a good consistency, the hospital can choose one of their own actual situation. Nanning area female vaginitis detection rate of aerobic bacteria second only to bacterial vaginosis, aerobic bacteria for aerobic vaginitis should take a scientific and effective treatment programs to enhance the efficiency of aerobic bacteria vaginitis treatment.