一 发表在《开放》杂志二○○○年五月号的《李慎之访谈录》,今年又在《书屋》第一期改名《新世纪 老任务》重新发表。其中有些观点和提法,很难让读者赞同。我去年曾给《开放》杂志提过建议,修正“鲁迅先生不反封建”这一段话,没有回音。我认为断定在鲁迅著作中找不到“反封建”字样,是与鲁迅著作不相符合的。作者李慎之先生在答客文中说“……五十多年前受教育的人都知道秦始皇废封建,立郡县以后(中国)就不再是封 A “Interview with Li Shenzhi” published in the May 2000 issue of the “Open” magazine was reissued this year in the first phase of the “Bookstore”, which was renamed “the old task in the new century.” Some of these ideas and references, it is difficult for readers to agree. Last year, I made a suggestion to the “Open” magazine to amend the remark “Mr. Lu Xun does not oppose feudalism.” I did not reply. I think it is inconsistent with Lu Xun’s work to conclude that we can not find the words “anti-feudal” in the writings of Lu Xun. In his answer to Hakka’s article, the author, Mr. Li Shenzhi, said: "Everyone educated more than 50 years ago knew that the Qin Shi Huang wasted and was feudal. After Li County was established, China was no longer a seal