论文部分内容阅读
美国当代著名作家梯姆·奥布莱恩的《恋爱中的汤姆卡特》出版后,国外批评界褒贬不一,其论争的焦点主要集中于小说中的人物叙述者托马斯·齐柏林。持肯定意见的人主要关注的是其滑稽、幽默性,将该作品当成了纯粹的娱乐性小说;而持批评态度的人则因奥布莱恩赋予小说中令人厌恶、病态的人物叙述者一个快乐圆满的结局而深表不满。运用叙事批评方法,结合真实作者的创作语境对该作品的解读表明,上述两种批评方法都有失偏颇,因为运用创伤化的人物叙述者实则是隐含作者的一种控制策略,它与作者力图通过人物叙述实现多重讲述目是密切关联的。
After the publication of “Tom Carter in Love” by the famous contemporary American writer Tim O’Brien, the criticisms of foreign critics are mixed. The focus of his argument mainly focuses on the novelist Thomas Zeppelin. Those who hold positive opinions are mostly concerned with their comic, humorous qualities and their use of the work as purely entertaining novels; those who hold critical attitudes, for the reason that O’Brien has given disgusting and morbid narrators to the novel Happy happy ending and deeply dissatisfied. The use of narrative criticism and interpretation of the work in the context of the true author’s writing suggests that both methods of criticism are biased because the use of traumatic character narrators is in fact a control strategy of the implied author, It is closely related that the author seeks to achieve multiple narration through character narration.