论文部分内容阅读
检察机关在进行民事行政抗诉过程中,对申诉案件受理的审查方式主要是形式审查,其逻辑路径多为演绎论证模式中的法律推理;立案初审结论更多地表现为或然性特征,即推理的表现形式为或然性推理;民行抗诉审查要科学分析生效裁判的逻辑路径,运用逻辑推理方法寻找其法律漏洞并有针对性地展开证明或反驳;民行抗诉的实质就是对存有瑕疵的生效判决、裁定通过阐述抗诉理由,运用逻辑方法,而指出裁判程序或结论等论题、论据和论证过程的违法性、错误性。
In the process of civil administrative protest, procuratorial organs mainly examine the form of censorship of appeal cases, and its logical path is mostly legal reasoning in the deductive argumentation mode. The conclusion of the first instance filing is more likely to be a probabilistic feature, that is, reasoning The form of conduct is probabilistic reasoning; civil defense protest review should scientifically analyze the logical path of the effective judge, use logical reasoning method to find its legal loopholes and carry out targeted proof or rebuttal; the essence of civil protest is the existence of flaws The ruling ruled that the reasons for the protest were justified and logical methods were used to point out the illegitimacy and wrongness of the referees’ procedures or conclusions, the arguments and the process of argumentation.