论文部分内容阅读
目的根据我军和美军招收飞行学员听力标准分析青少年航空学校(航校)学员医学选拔听力检查资料,了解两军招飞听力标准的差别,为招收青少年航校学员医学选拔听力标准的制定提供建议。方法收集2016年度河北省青少年航校学员的首次听力检查资料,按照我军和美军招飞听力标准进行评判,区分高频和中、低频以及总体听力情况统计出合格和不合格人数并进行对照分析。结果按我军标准不合格的应征者对照美军标准也趋向于不合格;在高频听力和总体听力筛查上,美军标准的淘汰率较我军标准更高,但在中、低频听力筛查上,美军标准与我军标准的淘汰率差异无统计学意义。结论美军招飞听力标准在高频听力方面严于我军招飞听力标准,中、低频听力标准与我军标准不同,但在淘汰率上没有差别。建议招收青少年航校的听力标准借鉴美军招飞听力标准。
Objective To analyze the medical auditions of juvenile aviation schools (aeronautical schools) based on the listening standards of pilots receiving military training by our military and the U.S. military, to understand the differences between the standards of military training and recruitment of juveniles and to provide suggestions for enrolling the juvenile pilot . Methods The data of first hearing examination of trainees from Hebei Youth Aeronautical Institutions in 2016 were collected and judged according to the standard of hearing of our military and the U.S. military to distinguish between high frequency, medium frequency, low frequency and overall hearing. The number of qualified and unqualified persons was analyzed and compared . As a result, the standards of those who failed to meet the requirements of our military standards also tended to be unqualified according to the standards of the U.S. military. On the basis of high-frequency audiometry and overall hearing screening, the U.S. military standard had a higher elimination rate than our military standards. However, There was no significant difference in the elimination rate of the U.S. military standards and our military standards. Conclusions The hearing and hearing standards of the U.S. military strikes and intercepts are stricter than those of our army in hearing and hearing at high frequencies. The hearing standards at medium and low frequencies are different from our military standards, but there is no difference in the rejection rate. Advised to recruit juvenile school hearing standards Reference to the United States strokes and audition standards.