论文部分内容阅读
1955到1960年间,格温朵琳·布鲁克斯创作了两首关于艾米特·提尔私刑案的诗歌,对这个引发民权运动的事件做出了回应。从内容上,诗人以叙事谣曲的原型故事为主题,从白人女主人公的角度回顾私刑案,并打破她对私刑的浪漫想象。从形式上,布鲁克斯“宣称”这两首诗都是叙事谣曲,但实际上它们都是自由体诗。布鲁克斯以欧洲传统叙事谣曲形式的假装在场来暗示白人构建的法律秩序的虚伪性,也就是说,以一种规范形式的缺场来讽刺种族公正和正义的缺失,以诗性的正义呼唤民权运动的到来。
From 1955 to 1960, Gwillingon Brooks wrote two poems about Lynch Lynch’s lynchings and responded to the events that led to the civil rights movement. In terms of content, the poet regards the archetypal story of narrative ballad as the theme, reviews the lynchings from the perspective of the white heroines and breaks her romantic imagination of lynchings. Formually, both the Brooks “claims ” are narrative ballads, but in fact they are all liberal poems. Brooks pretended to be present in the form of a ritual of European traditional narration to suggest the hypocrisy of the legal order that white people constructed, that is, to ridicule racial justice and the absence of justice in a normative absence, to call for civil rights with poetic justice The arrival of exercise.