论文部分内容阅读
三大诉讼法中都规定了“以事实为根据”的原则 ,我国的学者和诉讼实践对“事实”的理解和认识有所偏颇 ,不利于司法操作。笔者通过历史考察 ,认为查清案件的原本事实是古今所有诉讼制度追求的共同理想 ,依据对诉讼证明过程的分析 ,得出了客观的原本事实并不能百分之百的实现的结论。因此我们应正视现实 ,正确理解“事实” ,采取切合实际的务实态度 ,以利于研究的开展和司法的操作。
The three major procedural laws all stipulate the principle of “based on facts”. Our scholars and litigation practice are biased in understanding and understanding “facts”, which is not conducive to judicial operation. Through the historical investigation, the author thinks that finding out the original facts of the case is the common ideal pursued by all the litigation systems in ancient and modern times. Based on the analysis of litigation proof process, the author concludes that the objective facts can not be realized 100%. Therefore, we should face the truth, correctly understand the “facts” and adopt a pragmatic and pragmatic approach so as to facilitate the conduct of research and the operation of the judiciary.