论文部分内容阅读
当前学界对工业遗产价值评价争论的焦点有三:一是关于经济价值的认识问题;二是评价方法的合理选择问题;三是评价方法选择后如何科学设计评价流程问题。对遗产保护、经济学和管理学相关知识的综合分析表明,目前对工业遗产价值认识和评价存在一些误区。对工业遗产价值评价应分阶段考虑,各阶段的侧重点和评价方法完全不同。基于对当代综合评价方法原理与应用方式的研究,可厘清适用于工业遗产本体价值评价的科学方法;通过对既往评价方法与流程的梳理与对比发现,工业遗产本体价值评价在方法运用与流程设计中也存在需完善和改进的方面。
The current academic circles focus on the debate on the valuation of industrial heritage in three aspects: one is on the understanding of economic value; the other is on the reasonable choice of evaluation methods; the other is on how to evaluate the process of scientific evaluation after the selection of methods. The comprehensive analysis of heritage protection, economics and management knowledge shows that there are some misunderstandings about the current industrial heritage value recognition and evaluation. The valuation of industrial heritage should be considered in stages, with emphasis on different stages and evaluation methods completely different. Based on the research on the principle and application of contemporary comprehensive evaluation method, we can clarify the scientific method which is suitable for the value evaluation of industrial heritage ontology. By combing and contrasting the previous evaluation methods and processes, There are also areas for improvement and improvement.