刑法似乎总是一副冰冷严酷的面孔,让人望而生畏。然而,刑法本身并非无情,它的“温情”已经蕴涵在条文与精神之中,只是缺少解读与发现。在刑事审判中,经常可以看到被告人的痛哭流涕和真心忏悔,而在旁听席上总是坐着惴惴不安的人。当法官法槌落下,一纸判决书就将被告人的命运定格。然而,泪水、忏悔和纠结往往并不体现在判决书中。因为判决书最关心的是运用逻辑力量抽象出来的犯罪事实,社会背景、生活经历、人生挫折等个体化的犯罪原因无法进入诉讼程序。在刑法语境中,规则的普适性要求 Criminal law seems always a cold and grim face, daunting. However, the criminal law itself is not heartless, its “warmth ” has been implied in the articles and spirit, but the lack of interpretation and discovery. In criminal trials, defendants can often be seen crying and repenting, while sitting in the auditorium always restless people. When the judge gaffe falls, a paper judgment decides the fate of the defendant. However, tears, repentance and entanglements are often not reflected in the verdict. Because the verdict is most concerned about the use of logical forces abstracted crime facts, social background, life experience, life frustration and other individual criminal reasons can not enter the proceedings. In the context of criminal law, the universality of the rules requires