近两年来 ,在有关简易逻辑教学的讨论中屡见文章举例说明 :有些命题尽管含有联结词却仍然是简单命题 .这些文章的论点也并非完全一致 ,有的声言其所谓“联结词”是指普通联结词 ,不是指逻辑联结词 ,因此所举各例与新教材中的定义“不合逻辑联结词的命题称为简单命题”并无抵触 In the past two years, in the discussions on the teaching of simple logic, there have been frequent articles that illustrate that some propositions are still simple propositions, even though they contain conjunctions. The arguments of these articles are not exactly the same, and some of them claim that the so-called “joint words” refer to Ordinary connectives do not refer to logical connectives. Therefore, the definitions in the examples cited in the new textbook “The proposition that illogical connectives are called simple propositions” are not inconsistent.