论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨妈咪爱联合思密达治疗小儿腹泻的临床效果及临床价值。方法选取我科2011年9月至2012年7月收治的小儿腹泻患儿76例,随机分为观察组与对照组两组,每组38例,观察组给予妈咪爱联合思密达治疗,对照组单一采用思密达治疗,观察对比两组治疗效果。结果观察组显效26例,有效10例,无效2例,总有效率为94.7%,对照组显效19例,有效11例,无效8例,总有效率为78.9%,两者比较有显著差异性(P<0.05);观察组大便好转时间为(1.64±0.56)d,止泻时间为(1.09±0.42)d,对照组大便好转时间为(2.32±0.63)d,止泻时间为(1.98±0.59)d,两组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组退热时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论治疗小儿腹泻,妈咪爱联合思密达的联合治疗方案比单一用药治疗效果好,临床工作应该广泛应用联合治疗,以提高临床疗效。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect and clinical value of Mami love combined with Smecta in the treatment of infantile diarrhea. Methods Seventy-six children with pediatric diarrhea admitted to our department from September 2011 to July 2012 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 38 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with Mami love combined with Smectite, The control group was treated with Smectite alone, and the treatment effect was observed and compared between the two groups. Results The observation group was markedly effective in 26 cases, effective in 10 cases, ineffective in 2 cases, the total effective rate was 94.7%, the control group markedly effective in 19 cases, effective in 11 cases, ineffective in 8 cases, the total effective rate was 78.9%, the two were significantly different (1.64 ± 0.56) d and 1.09 ± 0.42 d respectively in the observation group, and 2.32 ± 0.63 d in the control group and 1.98 ± 0.5 in the control group (P <0.05) 0.59) d, the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups in the antipyretic time (P> 0.05). Conclusion The treatment of children with diarrhea, mommy love combined with Smectite than the single treatment of combination therapy is effective, clinical work should be widely used in combination therapy to improve clinical efficacy.