论文部分内容阅读
体内埋藏式自动复律去颤器(AIDD)在预防心律失常猝死方面的成功使再次引起了对电器械治疗心律失常作用的关注。自60年代起搏器临床应用以来,抗心动过速受起搏器已有了很大的发展,但是,由于以下的一些原因,使这些电器械的应用受到限制,即:病人顾虑在植入这类电器械后成为年老或病态的形象、医师希望尽量用药物来控制心律失常、其它途径如非手术消融方法在抗室上(性心动过)速治疗中的竞争、室(性心动过)速起搏治疗引起致命性室这加速的潜在危险等。起搏方式中止心动过速在病人自身感觉上较AICD的电击方法好,目前正在发展这类电器械以使这二种功能结合起来。
The success of an in-body Burgeon defibrillator (AIDD) in preventing sudden cardiac arrhythmia has once again raised concerns about the role of electrical devices in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Since the clinical application of pacemakers in the 1960s, anti-tachycardia has been greatly advanced by pacemakers, however, the use of these devices has been limited for a number of reasons, namely: Such electrical appliances become old or ill-formed, physicians want to use drugs to control arrhythmias, other methods such as non-surgical ablation in the anti-ventricular (tachycardia) speed competition in the treatment room (tachycardia Rapid pacing therapy causes potentially fatal room accelerations and so on. Pacing aborting tachycardia is better than AICD’s method of electroshocking in patients’ own senses and is currently being developed to combine these two functions.