论文部分内容阅读
现行《仲裁法》中关于国内仲裁协议效力、仲裁员和仲裁程序、仲裁裁决撤销或执行等方面的很多强行规则由于历史局限性而很不合理,需要尽快修订。对仲裁协议效力方面强行规则的修订目标主要是明确我国公法组织的主体可仲裁性、客体可仲裁性范围、仲裁协议的形式和内容。对于仲裁员和仲裁程序方面强行规则的修改应当着重于解决仲裁员的披露义务、违法的民事责任及遵循正当程序问题。关于仲裁裁决撤销或执行方面强行规则的修订重点应是为防止司法冲突而使撤销与不予执行的理由相一致,以及缩短公共政策事由以外的撤销裁决时限等。
The current Arbitration Law has many irrefutable reasons about the effectiveness of domestic arbitration agreements, arbitrators and arbitration procedures, and the revocation or enforcement of arbitral awards. Due to historical limitations, it is unreasonable and needs to be amended as soon as possible. The revision of the mandatory rules on the validity of arbitration agreements mainly aims to clarify the subject arbitrability of arbitration, the scope of object arbitrability and the form and content of the arbitration agreement. Modifications to the rules governing arbitrators and arbitration proceedings should focus on resolving arbitrator’s disclosure obligations, civil liability for violations and following due process issues. Amendments to the rules governing the revocation or enforcement of arbitral awards should focus on consistency between the grounds for avoidance and non-enforcement to prevent judicial conflicts, and shorter time-frames for the rescission of rulings other than public policy.