一般说来,言语是美辞的形式。但美辞的形式并不等于言语。这如同说语言是一种交际工具,但交际工具并不就是语言。言语作为对语言的具体运用和个人变体,它还仅是一种语言现象。作为形式,它也只是美辞的符号形式,即语言形式。美辞的形式除了语言符号之外,还有自身内部的思维形式,即逻辑形式。逻辑形式是事物之间的规律性通过思维的作用在美辞中的内部表现。它相当于话语,文章的思路或内容本身的层次和结构。在语言学中,它不属言语的形式而属于言语的内容。可见言语和“辞形”不是等值的。从只一方面看,言语作为一种语言现象,也有自己的形式和内容。语言、文字和语法就是它的形式,语义就是它的内容。语义在美辞中只能算是形式而不是内容。美辞的内容只能是语义所表示的事物而不是语义本身。可见,美辞和言语各有自己的形式和内容,各属不同的科学范畴。因此,我们对 In general, speech is the form of speech. However, the form of beautiful speech is not equal to words. This is like saying that language is a communicative tool, but communicative tools are not just words. As a language to the specific use of language and personal variation, it is only a linguistic phenomenon. As a form, it is just a symbolic form of the United States, that is, a language form. In addition to the language of the United States rhetorical form, but also its own internal form of thinking, that is, logical form. Logical form is the internal representation of the regularity of things through the function of thinking. It is equivalent to discourse, the idea of ​​the article or the level and structure of the content itself. In linguistics, it is not a verbal form but a verbal content. Visible speech and “speech” is not equivalent. From one aspect only, speech as a linguistic phenomenon has its own form and content. Language, text and grammar are its forms, and semantics is its content. Semantics in the United States can only be regarded as the form rather than the content. The content of the beautiful speech can only be the semantic representation of things rather than the semantic itself. Can be seen that the United States rhetoric and speech each have their own form and content, each belonging to a different scientific category. So we are right