过去,在旧的计划经济体制下,政府对经济的管理带有较多的“人治”因素。因为这种管理是以直接控制为主的,这种控制的法律性因素比较薄弱,它基本上是诉诸于单一的指令性的行政控制手段。对于行政手段的作用我们不能简单地予以否定,应当承认,在一定的时期和一定的条件下,行政手段的确曾发挥过重要的作用。例如,我国曾出现过几次经济过热,由于基建投资规模过大,生产资料价格猛涨,引发通货膨胀,同时造成整个国民经济和社会的不稳定,于是政府不得不进行治理整顿,并运用了一系列行政手段。如由国务院派工作组下到各省市,命令一些工程立即下马。这种行政命令的手段见效比较快,对于尽快制止经济过热现象起到了比较明显的效果。所以,行政手段也不失为是一种行之有效的手段。 In the past, under the old planned economic system, the government carried more “rule of man” over the management of the economy. Because such management is dominated by direct control, the legal factor of such control is relatively weak. It basically relies on a single mandatory administrative control. We can not simply negate the role of administrative means. We should admit that administrative measures have indeed played an important role in a certain period of time and under certain conditions. For example, in our country, there have been several overheated economic conditions. Due to the over-investment in infrastructure projects and soaring prices of the means of production, which have led to inflation and destabilization of the entire national economy and society, the government has had to rectify and use it A series of administrative measures. If the State Council dispatches a working group to all provinces and cities, it orders that some projects be immediately dismissed. The effective means of such administrative orders are quicker and have a clear effect on ending the overheating economy as soon as possible. Therefore, administrative means is an effective means.