论文部分内容阅读
目的了解深圳市区域公共卫生应急队伍现状及其对岗位培训的需求,分析影响公共卫生应急岗位培训的因素,对培训模式及效果的研究提供科学依据。方法整群抽取区属疾病预防控制中心、卫生监督所及随机抽取区属医疗机构及社康中心从事公共卫生应急工作的技术人员,共对47名人员进行问卷调查。结果 47名人员中参加工作年限平均为12年;中高级以上职称36名,占76.6%;本科以上学历43名,占91.5%;有45人(占95.7%)从事过公共卫生应急工作;需要参加培训的前三位原因:岗位工作需要、个人兴趣、晋升需要;影响参加培训的前三位原因:工作离不开、不知道培训信息和内容不合适;培训方法选择,分别为小讲课(78.7%)、情景教学(72.3%)、示教(63.8%)及小组讨论(57.4%);在培训形式上函授、学历/学位教育、进修和培训项目是最受欢迎的形式;培训内容的需求,超过78%的被调查者认为应以疾病监测理论与方法,现场调查和处理能力,专业技术方案等事项为主。结论基层公共卫生应急队伍的培训应从专业人员学历、职称等特点出发,通盘考虑影响因素,加强培训前期准备工作,合理安排培训形式和内容。
Objective To understand the current situation of public health contingent in Shenzhen and its demand for job training, and to analyze the factors influencing public health emergency training and to provide a scientific basis for the research on training mode and effect. Methods The cluster extraction area belongs to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Health Supervision Office, and the technical personnel randomly selected from the medical institutions and the community health centers for public health emergency work. A total of 47 personnel were surveyed. Results A total of 47 staff members participated in the work experience for an average of 12 years. Among them, 36 were intermediate and senior professional titles, accounting for 76.6%; 43 were bachelor degree or above, accounting for 91.5%; 45 were employed (95.7%) engaged in public health emergency work; The first three reasons for participation in training: job needs, personal interests, promotion needs; affect the first three reasons for participation in training: work can not be separated, do not know the training information and content inappropriate; training methods are selected, 78.7%), situational teaching (72.3%), teaching (63.8%) and group discussion (57.4%). Corresponding training, diploma education, degree education, further education and training programs are the most popular forms. Demand, more than 78% of the respondents think that should be disease monitoring theory and methods, on-site investigation and processing capabilities, professional and technical programs and other matters. Conclusion The training of grass-roots public health emergency teams should start from the characteristics of professional qualifications and professional titles, and consider the influencing factors in an all-round way, strengthen the preparatory work for training and reasonably arrange the training forms and contents.