论文部分内容阅读
《张衡传》写道:“衡少善属文,游于三辅,因入京师,观太学,遂通五经,贯六艺。”课本中对该处的“六艺”注为“礼、乐、射、御,书、数六种学问和技能。”有人提出《师说》中有“六艺经传,皆通习之”一句,其“六艺”的解释注为“六艺,指《诗》、《书》、《礼》、《乐》、《易》、《春秋》六种经书。《乐》久已失传……。”这两处对“六艺”的解释不是正相矛盾么?对于这个难点,有一论之必要。
“Zhang Heng Chuan” wrote: “Heng Shaoshan belongs to the text, swim in Sanfu, because into the capital division, view of the school, then through the classics, consistent six arts.” The textbook of the Department of “Liu Yi” annotated as “ceremony, music , Shooting, Imperial, books, a few of the six kinds of knowledge and skills. ”It was suggested that“ teacher said ”in the“ Six Arts by the pass, all learning from, ”one of the“ Six Arts ”explanation Note“ Six Arts, ”Book“, ”ceremony“, ”music“, ”easy“, ”Spring and Autumn“ six kinds of books. ”Music“ has long been lost ...... ”Is the two interpretation of“ Six Arts ”is not contradictory? , There is a theory of necessity.