论文部分内容阅读
在1993年至1995年期间,某厂截留另一电厂排放的冷却锅炉后的废弃水发电,该市水利局于1995年10月31日向某厂发出水资源费收缴通知书,认定某厂利用另一电厂从江河中提取的用于冷却锅炉后的排放水发电获得了经济效益,根据国家和省的有关规定,决定某厂应缴纳水资源费.某厂对水利局所认定的发电量没有异议,但对水利局实施的征收水资源费的行政行为提出异议,即向法院提起了行政诉讼.
During 1993-1995, a factory intercepted waste water from a cooling boiler discharged from another power plant to generate electricity. The Municipal Water Conservancy Bureau issued a notice of collection of water resource fee to a certain factory on October 31, 1995, and found that a factory used another A power plant extracted from the river for cooling the boiler after the discharge of water power generation obtained economic benefits, according to the relevant provisions of the state and the province, decided to pay a water resource fee for a plant. A plant on the Water Authority identified the power generation has no objection, However, it objected to the administrative act of levying the water resource fee implemented by the Water Conservancy Bureau, that is, brought an administrative lawsuit to the court.