论文部分内容阅读
通过对美国宪法制宪意图的解析,可以看出自由主义、民主政治是美国制宪者所批评的对象,在宪法上并不具有合法性。“共和”是制宪者们为美国人民选择通达自由与幸福的生活方式和宪法框架,这种“共和”的思想与模板来自遥远的古罗马共和国。对罗马的古典共和主义与美国宪法中的共和主义内涵的比较,显示出当代新罗马共和派的理论启示,也可辨别出它的缺陷。
Through the analysis of the intention of constitutional constitution in the United States, we can see that liberalism and democracy are the objects criticized by American constitutionalists, and they are not legally valid in the constitution. “Republicanism” is a life style and constitutional framework for the constitutionalists to choose for the American people to gain freedom and happiness. Such “republican” ideas and templates come from the ancient Roman Republic. A comparison of the classical republicanism in Rome with that of the republicanism in the American constitution shows the theoretical revelation of contemporary neo-Roman republicans and its flaws.