论文部分内容阅读
未能满足商业秘密构成要件的保密信息,只要具有经济价值或竞争优势,哪怕存续时间非常短暂,仍具有财产属性。美国就“热点新闻”形成的系列判例,将利用他人成本而直接收益的行为定性为搭便车,属于一种不正当竞争行为,并设定了规制这一行为的明确标准。我国《反不正当竞争法》及其相关司法解释均缺乏规制这一行为的技术务款。通过比较法研究所获得的美国判例法的有关理念,可为我国立法和司法实践借鉴。
Confidential information that fails to meet the requirements of a commercial secret possesses a property of property as long as it has economic value or competitive advantage, even if the duration of existence is very short. The series of jurisprudence formed by the United States on “Hot News” characterize the direct benefit of using the cost of others as a free ride, which is a form of unfair competition and sets a clear standard for regulating this act. China’s “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” and its related judicial interpretation lack the technical service to regulate this behavior. The concepts of case law in the United States obtained through the comparative law study can be used as reference for our country’s legislation and judicial practice.