论文部分内容阅读
北宋熙宁青苗法的学术分歧体现于对《周礼·泉府》“国服之息”概念的诠释差异。王安石取郑玄注,强调社会分工、货币属性和国家借贷;而以韩琦为代表的反对派则取郑众解,强调其自然经济特征、实物属性,反对国家借贷取息。新法将经学理论与政策结合,且以价格杠杆诱导百姓使用货币而非实物,受到反对者的批评。受政治立场影响,南宋以后学者多否定王安石《周礼》学,乃至对郑玄注甚至《周礼》本身提出质疑,显现出政治史与学术史的相互渗透影响。
The academic disagreement of the law of Xi-ning and Qing-nui in the Northern Song Dynasty reflected in the different interpretations of the concept of “Zhouli Spring House” and “National Service Information”. Wang Anshi took Zheng Xuan note, emphasizing the social division of labor, monetary attributes and national lending; while the opposition represented by Han Qi took Zheng Zhong Xie, emphasizing its natural and economic characteristics, in-kind attributes, and opposed the borrowing and taking of interest by the state. The new law combines the theory and policy of economics, and using price lever to induce people to use currency rather than physical objects is criticized by opponents. Influenced by the political position, many scholars denied Wang Anshi’s Zhou Li’s study after the Southern Song Dynasty, and even challenged Zheng Xuan Zhu and even Zhou Li itself, revealing the mutual infiltration of political history and academic history.