论文部分内容阅读
在中西哲学史上,老子、庄子、柏拉图、康德等中外哲人洞见了三种“无”:“纯无”(命名无、非存在)、“否定性的无”(有的无)和“主体不性的无”。三种“无”各有其用:“纯无”的作用在于和“纯有”一起作为一切知识的开端;“否定性的无”的作用在于保证有的功用得以可能;“主体不性的无”的作用在于告诫人们顺其自然,不要过分干预。与三种“无”相关的是虚假和错误的不可见。在此基础上,本文分析了常人对“无”的错误理解,以及对“无”的认识和把握波及文明的影响力,并指出由于对“无”的不同理解而导致的中西文化的巨大差异,试图让中西哲学在源头上进行对话,真正探讨二者的同异及其对文化发展的影响,从而由传统启迪新思。
In the history of Chinese and Western philosophy, Chinese and foreign philosophers such as Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Plato, Kant have seen three kinds of “without”: “pure without” (named without, non existent), “without negative” None) and “Subject is not sexual without ”. Three kinds of “no” each have their own use: “pure without ” role lies in and “pure ” together as the beginning of all knowledge; “negative no ” role is to ensure that some function Is possible; “the role of non-sexual ” role is to warn people to let it go, do not unduly interfere. Related to the three “none” is false and false invisible. On this basis, this article analyzes the common people’s misunderstanding of “without ” and the understanding of “no ” and grasp the impact of spreading to civilization, and pointed out that due to different understanding of The great difference between Chinese and Western cultures, trying to make the dialogue between Chinese and Western philosophy at the source, and really discuss the similarities and differences between the two and their impact on cultural development, so as to enlighten new ideas from tradition.