《四库全书总目提要.词曲类》对毛晋《宋六十名家词》有很多的评判。四库馆臣首先肯定其在考据、流播诸方面的功绩,但更多的是指摘,比如指责其不重底本、校勘草率等。究其原因有二:一是,毛词刻本确有不足——其实校书如扫秋叶,旋扫旋生,毛晋如此大规模的刊刻词本,怎能保证没有一些疏漏?二是,清人对前朝文献本能地带有主观拒斥的态度,有时甚至不免吹毛求疵。这除了政治的因素以外,更主要的是两种学术传统——汉学与宋学的冲突,这种现象的产生实际不过是学术史上的“破立”之例罢了。 “Sikuquanshu chief executive summary. Song class” on Mao Jin “Song sixty words” there are many judgments. Siku Pavilion first affirmed its merit in the test, the dissemination of various aspects of merit, but more refers to the accusation, such as accusing it of not base, such as sloppy. There are two reasons for this: First, there is a real shortage of inscriptions - in fact, such as cleaning the autumn leaves of the school, sweeping the circle, Mao Jin’s large-scale publication of the inscription, how can we ensure that there are some omissions? Second, Qing people instinctively refuted the former literature with a subjective repudiation of the attitude, and sometimes can not help but picky. Apart from the political factors, it is more important that there are two academic traditions: the conflict between sinology and songology, and the emergence of such a phenomenon is actually nothing but a case of “breaking down” in academic history.