论文部分内容阅读
从分配正义的角度来讲,施与显然不同于交换,交换的原则是对等,施与只是付出而没有获取,它是不对等的。在中国传统社会,施与其实一定程度上产生了平衡社会财富的作用。但在以正义、自由、平等为行为价值中心的现代社会,社会公平是通过社会基本分配制度来保证的,而施与,在它因利益非对等而成为一种美德的同时,由于与正义的对等原则相冲突,表现出了其社会功用限度。现代社会,一些与正义相左的德行,也许要受到重新审视。
From the perspective of distributive justice, the principle of giving and applying obviously differs from that of exchange and exchange. Equality is the principle of giving and giving, and it is unequal. In traditional Chinese society, giving and taking in fact produced the effect of balancing social wealth to a certain extent. However, in the modern society where justice, freedom and equality are the values of behavior, social justice is guaranteed through the basic distribution system of society. Since it is a virtue of non-equivalence of interests, The reciprocal principle of conflict, showing its limits of social function. In modern society, some virtues that are incompatible with justice may need to be re-examined.