论文部分内容阅读
193 6年内债整理案对江浙资产阶级的经济利益无疑是继 1 93 2年内债整理后的又一次掠夺 ,对南京国民政府的债信又是一次严重的破坏。特别是统一公债发行前夕公债风潮的出现 ,不仅使国民政府的债信大打折扣 ,而且将国民政府政治腐败的恶劣昭示于众。但考诸当时的财政经济状况 ,整理债务可以说是国民政府于无可如何之中找到的一条减轻财政压力的较好途径。内债整理案的实施暂时减轻了政府的财政负担 ,并使债务结构趋向合理化 ;它还是国民政府准备抗战 ,实行统制经济政策的步骤之一 ;整理案也彻底打破了私营银行业对政府财政的幻想 ,开始走上疏远政府财政 ,加强同工商业结合 ,从而较好发挥银行经济职能的道路。另外 ,此次整理案是在政府实现了金融垄断 ,江浙资产阶级已开始沦为政府附庸的情况下实施的 ,这也是此次整理案与 1 93 2年内债整理案的最大不同之处。
The economic interests of the bourgeoisie in Jiangsu and Zhejiang in the last six years were undoubtedly another plunder after the debt reparations in 1993 and were again devastated by the credit to the Nanjing National Government. In particular, the emergence of a public debt crisis on the eve of the unification of public bonds not only greatly reduced the credibility of the national government but also exposed the bad political corruption of the national government. However, taking into account the financial and economic conditions prevailing at the time and sorting out debts can be considered as a better way for the government to find ways to reduce financial pressure. The implementation of the debt consolidation case temporarily lightened the financial burden on the government and rationalized its debt structure. It was also one of the steps for the Kuomintang government to prepare for the war of resistance against Japan and to impose economic control policies. The consolidation case completely broke the illusion of private banking on government finance , Began to embark on the alienation of government finance, strengthen the combination of industry and commerce, so as to give better play to the bank’s economic functions. In addition, the order was put into effect when the government realized the financial monopoly and the bourgeoisie in Jiangsu and Zhejiang began to degenerate into a government vassal. This was also the biggest difference between this order and the 1923 domestic debt consolidation case.