论文部分内容阅读
一、缘起《中国史研究》2001年第3期刊发了王曾瑜先生《绍兴和议与士人气节》一文,对何忠礼等先生《南宋史稿》(政治军事文化编,以下简称《南宋史稿》)一书中有关“绍兴和议”的问题进行了学术批评。次年,同刊第4期刊发了何忠礼先生的反批评文章《史学批评要坚持实事求是的原则》。与此相关,学界也相继刊发了其他一些文章,将讨论进一步引向深入,引起了一场关于“绍兴和议”问题的
First, the origin of “Chinese history” 2001 the third issue of Mr. Wang Zengyu “Shaoxing and the festival of public opinion festival,” a text on He Zhongli and other “history of the Southern Song Dynasty” (political and military culture, hereinafter referred to as “history of the Southern Song Dynasty” Scholarly criticism of the issue of “Shaoxing Peace Treaty” in his book. The following year, the same issue of No. 4 published an anti-criticism of Mr. He Zhongli article “historians should adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts.” Related to this, the academic circles have also published other articles in succession, further deepening the discussion and provoking a question concerning the “Shaoxing Peace Treaty”