论文部分内容阅读
《商标法》第六十四条第二项为保护善意第三人的规定成为了销售商的免死金牌。但审判实践中,销售商主观善意的认定、合法来源的证据形式、法院应否释明该权利和提供者应否参加诉讼、如何参加,均存在不同程度的异议。本文从我国侵权销售者免责事由制度的立法背景出发,认真剖析侵权销售者免责事由的原因,提出侵权销售者免责事由的适用标准和方法及处理方式,以完善我国侵权销售者免责的适用制度。
The provisions of Article 64, paragraph 2, of the “Trademark Law” for the protection of bona fide third parties have become the gold medals of sellers. However, in trial practice, there are varying degrees of objections to the determination of the seller’s goodwill, the evidence form of the legal source, whether the court should explain whether the right and the provider should participate in the litigation, and how to participate. Based on the legislative background of the system of exemption of tort seller in our country, this paper carefully analyzes the reasons for the exemption of tort seller, puts forward the applicable standards, methods and handling methods of the exemption of tort seller in order to improve the system of exemption of tort seller in our country.