论文部分内容阅读
沉默权自20世纪90年代成为我国学界研究的热点问题之一。近期轰动全国的“郑筱萸受贿案”中的被告人一审被判死刑的消息再次引起了对“坦白是否从宽”的激烈探讨,“坦白从宽,抗拒从严”的刑事政策也受到了质疑。本文正是从该政策的存废之争谈起,试图从该政策背后的制度背景和价值理念来分析引入沉默权在我国面临的困境,旨在从法律移植的有效性方面提出一些建议。
Since the 1990s, the right to silence has become one of the hot issues in academic research in our country. Recently, the news that “the defendant in Zheng Xiaoyu’s bribery case” recently made a sensation in the whole country once again aroused intense discussion on whether “confession is lenient” or “confession is lenient and resistance is strict” The policy has also been questioned. This article starts from the dispute of the policy of keeping or abusing, trying to analyze the dilemma of introducing the right of silence in our country from the institutional background and value philosophy behind the policy, and aims to put forward some suggestions on the effectiveness of legal transplantation.