论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨硕士生特质应对方式在自我接纳与特质焦虑之间的中介作用。方法:选取1040名硕士生,采用自我接纳量表(SAQ)、特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)和特质焦虑问卷(T-AI)评估其自我接纳、特质应对方式与特质焦虑。结果:(1)女生在消极应对方式方面的得分高于男生(t=-2.60,P<0.05),城市学生自我接纳得分高于农村学生(t=-2.37,P<0.05);(2)自我接纳得分与消极应对方式得分呈负相关(r=-0.57,P<0.001),与积极应对方式呈正相关(r=0.50,P<0.001);特质焦虑得分与自我接纳(r=-0.61,P<0.001)、积极应对方式(r=-0.49,P<0.001)呈负相关,与消极应对方式呈正相关(r=0.58,P<0.001);(3)自我接纳直接预测特质焦虑(β=-0.61,P<0.001),又通过消极应对方式间接预测特质焦虑(β=0.34,P<0.001),中介效应占总效应的31.8%;又通过积极应对方式间接预测抑郁(β=-0.25,P<0.001),中介效应占总效应的20.5%。结论:硕士生特质焦虑与自我接纳、特质应对方式密切相关,特质应对方式在自我接纳与特质焦虑之间起中介作用。
Objective: To explore the mediating role of the coping style of master’s students in self-acceptance and trait-anxiety. Methods: A total of 1040 master students were selected to assess their self-acceptance, idiosyncratic coping style and idiosyncratic anxiety using the self-acceptance questionnaire (TCQQ) and trait anxiety questionnaire (T-AI) Results: (1) Female students scored higher in negative coping style than male students (t = -2.60, P <0.05), and urban students scored higher than rural students (t = -2.37, P <0.05) The scores of self-acceptance and negative coping style were negatively correlated (r = -0.57, P <0.001), positively correlated with positive coping style (r = 0.50, P <0.001) (R = -0.49, P <0.001), negatively correlated with negative coping style (r = 0.58, P <0.001); (3) Self-acceptance directly predicted trait anxiety (β = -0.61, P <0.001). Median effect was also accounted for 31.8% of the total effect by indirect response to negative traits (β = 0.34, P <0.001) P <0.001), the mediating effect accounted for 20.5% of the total effect. Conclusion: There is a close correlation between trait trait anxiety and self-acceptance and trait-trapping styles of master students, and trait coping styles play an intermediary role between self-acceptance and trait-anxiety.