论文部分内容阅读
一法律解释的特性,十九世纪的神学者Schleiermacher[1](1768—1843),以文艺作品的解释之特性,来两相譬谕的。他在《解释之观念》(Lieber den Begriff der Hermeneutik)的一篇小品论文中,曾这样说道:“法律之解释,和文学书的解释不同。法律的解释,在于确定法律的范围,就是对于法律某某规定的不明确时,而决定其规定,究竟有如何的关系。”在这简单的字句之间,我们可以想象Schleiermacher的意见是怎样?换一句话说,恐怕法律不是文艺作品似的欣赏的对象,而为生活的规范了。在人
A characteristic of legal interpretation, Schleiermacher [1] (1768-1843), a nineteenth-century theologian, argues two ways with the explanatory power of literary works. In a sketchy essay by Lieber den Begriff der Hermeneutik, he once said: “The interpretation of law differs from the interpretation of literary books in that the interpretation of law consists in determining the scope of the law in terms of Laws and regulations do not specify the time, and determine its provisions, what is the relationship between. ”Between these simple words, we can imagine Schleiermacher’s opinion of what? In other words, I am afraid that the law is not like works of art Appreciating the object, but for the norms of life. In person