论文部分内容阅读
一、引言 2001年,南京市中山陵园管理局于中山陵风景管理区紫金山兴建“南京市紫金山观景台”.此事经当地媒体披露后,引起南京社会备界的强烈关注同年10月17日下午,东南大学施建辉、顾大松两位教师,以南京市规划局在对观景台的规划许可中未依法行政,致使观景台的建设给紫金山的自然风景造成破坏为由,向南京市中级人民法院提起行政诉讼,要求南京市规划局撤销对紫金山观景台的规划许可。中院以该案在本辖区内未造成重大影响,不属中院受理的在本辖区内的重大、复杂的行政案件的范围为由,裁定驳回原告之起诉。同年底,两原告拟准备向区法院起诉,但此时南京市规划局及相关部门,鉴于社会舆论及其他诸方面的压力,最终决定拆除“观景台”,故两原告放弃诉讼。2002年2月,南京市在保留下面
I. Introduction In 2001, Nanjing Zhongshan Cemetery Administrative Bureau built “Nanjing Zijin Mountain Observation Deck” in Zijinshan, a scenic management area of Zhongshan Mountain Mausoleum. This matter was disclosed by the local media and aroused strong concern from Nanjing social reserve community. In October of the same year On the afternoon of the 17th, two faculty members, Shi Jianhui and Gu Dasong, of Southeast University, took Nanjing Teachers’ Bureau of Science and Technology as the basis for planning the observation deck’s planning permission, which caused the destruction of the natural scenery of Zijin Mountain due to the construction of the observation deck. Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court filed an administrative lawsuit asking Nanjing Planning Bureau to withdraw planning permission for the Purple Mountain Observatory. The Intermediate People’s Court rejected the plaintiff’s prosecution on the grounds that the case did not have a significant impact in the jurisdiction and was not within the scope of major and complicated administrative cases within the jurisdiction accepted by the Court. At the end of the same year, the two plaintiffs were prepared to sue the district court, but at this time, the Planning Bureau of Nanjing Municipality and relevant departments, in view of the public opinion and other pressures, eventually decided to dismantle the “observation deck”. Therefore, the two plaintiffs abandoned the lawsuit. In February 2002, Nanjing retained the following