论文部分内容阅读
“特殊主义”与“普遍主义”的矛盾一直伴随着冲突法的历史发展。历史上最早形成的冲突法理论即巴托鲁斯的“法则区别说”是以民族国家为本位的比较温和的特殊主义理论范式,在其后的发展中走向了比较极端的特殊主义。18世纪末,萨维尼的“法律关系本座说”是随着资本主义世界市场的开拓而产生的以国际社会为本位的普遍主义理论范式。20世纪美国冲突法学界出现了特殊主义冲突法理论的复兴。片面的特殊主义和普遍主义各有其局限性,“最密切联系原则”的提出,表现出特殊主义和普遍主义融合统一的倾向,代表了当代冲突法理论发展的基本趋势。
The contradiction between “specialism” and “universalism” has always been accompanied by the historical development of the law of conflict. The earliest conflict theory in history, that is, Bartoluus ’s “law distinction”, is a relatively modest theory of specialism based on the nation - state. In its subsequent development, it has moved to the more extreme specialism. At the end of the eighteenth century, Savigny’s theory of “the seat of legal relations” was a universalist paradigm based on the international community, which emerged with the opening up of the capitalist world market. The 20th century American conflict law jurisprudence appeared the theory of special theory of conflict rejuvenation. One-sided specialism and universalism each have their own limitations. The formulation of the “principle of closest connection” shows the tendency of specialism and universalism to converge and unify, and represents the basic trend in the development of the theory of contemporary conflicts of law.