“唯物史观”作为一战后“新思潮”而传入中国,随即踏上其徘徊于物、心之间的“理论妥协”之旅。原有的“经济定命论”思路,一再使人陷入“物质”与“人力”的互斥困局;“俄国革命”却以显著事实证明着“革命意志”突破物质局限的强大力量。重新权衡“物质”与“人力”关系,为迫在眉睫的“社会改造”寻求理论支持,已经势在必行。然而,自理论本身来看,“唯物史观”理性、物质化的推演逻辑,却也最终指向一个蕴含强烈情感刺激的“两极对立”社会,暗示着“以冲突换革新”的有为心态。最后,艰涩的理论辨析终不敌急进的社会心理,必将到来的“冲突”不断放大,“革命意志”的创造作用被凸显,原本强调“物质限制”的唯物史观,终于被高度弹性的“意志论”成功重构。 “Materialist Conception of History” was introduced into China as a “new trend of thought” after the First World War, and then embarked on a journey of “compromise on theory” that lingered between things and mind. The original “theory of economic destiny” has caused people to plunge into the mutually exclusive dilemma of “substance” and “manpower” again and again; “” Russian Revolution “has proved” revolutionary will “ Break through the power of material limitations. It is imperative to re-balance the relationship between ”material“ and ”manpower“ and seek theoretical support for the pressing ”social transformation.“ However, judging from the theory itself, the rational and materialized logic of deduction of ”historical materialism“ eventually leads to a ”bipolar“ society that implies a strong emotional stimulus, ”There is a mentality. In the end, the hard-to-understand theory distinguishes the social psychology that will eventually emerge from an impetus, the ever-present “conflict” will continue to be magnified, and the creative role of “revolutionary will” will be highlighted. The historical materialism that originally emphasized “material restrictions” , Finally successfully rebuilt by the highly flexible “volition”.