论文部分内容阅读
此文摘自美国PB报告“Evaluation of the Decision to BeginProduction of the Roland Missile System”,该报告反映了美国选定生产罗兰特导弹系统的程序和过程。 有好几个组织机构参与了这一过程,他们为此做了不少试验和分析论证工作,并与霍克和小檞树等导弹系统作过比较。 美国国防部决定生产罗兰特导弹系统是基于罗兰特具有近程防御的能力,但是到目前为止的试验证明,罗兰特还存在某些重要的性能缺陷,诸如抗干扰问题、可靠性问题、全天候问题等。他们试图通过进一步的试验来验证罗兰特较之其它待选系统霍克和小檞树等所具有的优越性,并且相信经过某些改进的美国罗兰特导弹系统能优于欧洲的罗兰特导弹系统,能避免欧洲罗兰特某些重要的性能缺陷,然而,这些不都是轻而易举的。 整个报告共分为三章。本译文的第一部分是报告的第二章的前言和第一节(其它各节的标题是:罗兰特选用后的费用估计,罗兰特和其它系统的费用和可用性的比较,增加的技术维护费用,陆军和国防部的生产决定等);第二部分是报告的第三章。报告的第一章是前言。
This article is taken from the PB report “Evaluation of the Decision to Begin Production of the Roland Missile System,” which reflects the procedures and processes the U.S. has chosen to produce Roland missile systems. There are several organizations involved in this process, for which they have done a lot of testing and analysis and argumentation and compared them to missile systems such as Hawker and Olive Tree. The decision by the U.S. Department of Defense to create a Roland missile system is based on Roland’s ability to provide short-range defense, but tests so far prove that Roland has some important performance drawbacks such as anti-jamming, reliability, all-weather Wait. They tried to validate Roland’s superiority over other candidate systems such as Hawke and Koza tree by further experiments and believed that some improved Roland missile systems outperformed the European Roland missile system , To avoid some of Europe’s Roland’s important performance defects, however, these are not always easy. The entire report is divided into three chapters. The first part of this translation is the preamble and the first section of chapter II of the report (the titles of the other sections are: Roland’s cost estimate after selection, Roland’s comparison with other systems for cost and availability, increased technical maintenance costs , Army and Department of Defense production decisions, etc.); the second part is the third chapter of the report. The first chapter of the report is a preface.