这些年来不少学界同仁,纷纷提出各自的主张,最重要的莫过于这几种:一是弘扬国学;二是恢复经学传统;三是提倡儒学;四是倡导“新子学”。这几种主张自然都有各自的道理,但相比之下,我认为还是“新子学”的提法更加适合当前中国的实际。因此,自方勇先生于2012年提出了“新子学”构想之后,我即加以肯定,并连续写了《论新子学与中华文化之重构》和《再论新子学与中华文化之重构》两篇文章。毫无疑问,在当前学术界中,其他三种主张似乎影响 Many academic colleagues over the years have put forward their own propositions, the most important of these are: First, to promote the traditional Chinese studies; second is to restore the tradition of traditional Chinese medicine; third is to promote Confucianism; Fourth, advocate “new child learning.” All these ideas naturally have their own reasons, but in contrast, I think it is more appropriate for the formulation of “new scholarship” to be more suitable for the current reality of China. Therefore, since Mr. Fang Yong put forward the idea of ​​“new child learning” in 2012, I affirmed it and wrote in succession “On the Reconstruction of Neo-Confucianism and Chinese Culture” and “On New Neo- Reconstruction of Chinese Culture ”two articles. There is no doubt that in the current academic community, the other three claims seem to influence