论文部分内容阅读
汉代文学家多从“宗经”的角度评价《离骚》是否优秀,并引起了很大争议。当六朝人摆脱经学的束缚后,对评价文章优劣的标准有了新的看法,《文心雕龙·辨骚》是文学自觉思潮下的产物,通过刘勰对《离骚》的评价可以看出六朝文学批评的两个新特点:忽视文学政治讽谏的作用,重视个人真实情感的抒发;不用文学作品比附儒学经典,发现文学创作规律,追求文学自身的美。这两个批评角度也可以从同时期的其他文论作品中看到,这是时代的共识,也是思想的进步。
In the Han Dynasty, many writers evaluated the superiority of Li Sao from the perspective of “Sutra” and caused great controversy. When the people of the Six Dynasties got rid of the shackles of classics, they came up with a new view on the criteria for evaluating the pros and cons of the essay. The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons · Discerning Sao are the products of the literary consciousness of thought, as can be seen from Liu Xie’s evaluation of Li Sao Two new traits of literary criticism in the Six Dynasties: neglecting the role of literary and political satirical remonstrance and emphasizing the expression of personal real emotion; finding out the law of literary creation and pursuing the beauty of literary itself without comparing literary works with Confucian classics. These two angles of criticism can also be seen from other literary works in the same period. This is the consensus of the times and the progress of thinking.