论文部分内容阅读
约翰逊作品中的对话元素与传统的新古典主义的解读方式形成了鲜明的对比。长期以来,约翰逊被认为是英国18世纪新古典主义的代表,这一看法始于19世纪,在20世纪占据着主导地位,并且构成了日后约翰逊文艺理论批评的基础。从本质上讲,对约翰逊作品的这种人文主义的解读是一种封闭的、独白式的解读模式,它试图通过强调约翰逊作品的道德说教功能来统一他作品中出现的对话性、开放性和发展性的文本特征。应当说,对话贯穿了他作品的始终,构成了他作品一以贯之的主题,约翰逊认为意义和真理正是在不同的思想观点和价值立场的对话与互动之中形成的。
The element of dialogue in Johnson’s work contrasts sharply with traditional neoclassical interpretations. For a long time, Johnson was considered as representative of British neoclassicalism in the 18th century. This idea began in the 19th century and took the leading position in the 20th century. It also formed the basis of criticism of Johnson’s literary theory in the future. In essence, this kind of humanistic interpretation of Johnson’s works is a closed and monologue interpretation mode. It attempts to unify the dialogicity, openness and unity of his works by emphasizing the moralization function of Johnson’s works Developing textual features. It should be said that dialogue runs through his works and forms the consistent theme of his works. Johnson believes that meaning and truth are formed in the dialogues and interactions between different ideological and value positions.